Environmental Project's Achievements Reports Query System

Effiency Upgrade and System Maintenance Management of the Environmental Protection Penalty Follow-Up Management System 2006

Absrtact	Starting at October 2001, we spent 3 years to establish this system. In year 2004 to 2005, we promoted and upgraded the system. The system now is operating in EPA and each local environmental agency. The project carries out this year is to ensure normal operation and system maintenance. We also plan to change the system web version in order to upgrade the system performance and reduce the burden of repetitive filing. Through discussion between EPA and each department within the local environmental agency, we confirm the goal we would like to achieve and each web page presentation. The newly revised system was first tested on October 1, this year. We also send professional trainers to each local environmental agency to conduct training session. Meanwhile, we also conduct customer interview from EPA and each local agency to collect comment on topic of system upgrade. Using these comments as guidance, we upgrade this system accordingly. The achievements within this project including： 1.36 functions were added in this year. 2.8 requests regarding system operations were resolved in this year, which made operation becomes more stable. 3.3 functions for central government use were added and adjusted, which made the system use more friendly and data inquiry more accurate. 4.Computer security practices were held to ensure hackers have no chance to exploit systems or gain unauthorized access. 5.1 training session was held. The sessions made audiences become more familiar with the system. 6.1 customer interviews are conducted for all the local environmental agencies in this year. 7.Web-based Environmental Protection Penalty Follow-up Management System was developed by performing system analysis document, required format development reviewing, system analysis reviewing, system, development, and testing. 8.Install database exam program in each local agency to ensure the data transferring safety and data transmitted from local and to central government are the same. 9.2 training sessions were held in one-person vs. one-computer classroom. 10.16 meetings were held to understand the progress of the meeting. 11.All the problems sent out by local office were responded within 24 hours.
Keyword	inspection, final decision, overdue payment, penalty,environmental businesses

Absrtact

Starting at October 2001, we spent 3 years to establish this system. In year 2004 to 2005, we promoted and upgraded the system. The system now is operating in EPA and each local environmental agency. The project carries out this year is to ensure normal operation and system maintenance. We also plan to change the system web version in order to upgrade the system performance and reduce the burden of repetitive filing. Through discussion between EPA and each department within the local environmental agency, we confirm the goal we would like to achieve and each web page presentation. The newly revised system was first tested on October 1, this year. We also send professional trainers to each local environmental agency to conduct training session. Meanwhile, we also conduct customer interview from EPA and each local agency to collect comment on topic of system upgrade. Using these comments as guidance, we upgrade this system accordingly. The achievements within this project including： 1.36 functions were added in this year. 2.8 requests regarding system operations were resolved in this year, which made operation becomes more stable. 3.3 functions for central government use were added and adjusted, which made the system use more friendly and data inquiry more accurate. 4.Computer security practices were held to ensure hackers have no chance to exploit systems or gain unauthorized access. 5.1 training session was held. The sessions made audiences become more familiar with the system. 6.1 customer interviews are conducted for all the local environmental agencies in this year. 7.Web-based Environmental Protection Penalty Follow-up Management System was developed by performing system analysis document, required format development reviewing, system analysis reviewing, system, development, and testing. 8.Install database exam program in each local agency to ensure the data transferring safety and data transmitted from local and to central government are the same. 9.2 training sessions were held in one-person vs. one-computer classroom. 10.16 meetings were held to understand the progress of the meeting. 11.All the problems sent out by local office were responded within 24 hours.

Keyword

inspection, final decision, overdue payment, penalty,environmental businesses